Profil Literasi Dasar Keislaman Calon Mahasiswa Kelompok IPS melalui Seleksi CBT di UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta dan Implikasinya terhadap Pembinaan Keagamaan
Keywords:
Literasi Dasar Keislaman, Calon Mahasiswa, CBT, Analisis Butir, Pembinaan KeagamaanAbstract
Tujuan – Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan profil Literasi Dasar Keislaman calon mahasiswa kelompok IPS melalui seleksi CBT di UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta serta merumuskan implikasinya bagi pembinaan keagamaan. Penelitian dilakukan karena rata-rata yang relatif tinggi belum tentu menunjukkan kemampuan yang merata dan memadai pada setiap aspek.
Desain/metode/pendekatan – Penelitian menggunakan desain deskriptif kuantitatif berbasis data sekunder CBT dan diperkuat melalui FGD internal. Sampel analitik mencakup 884 peserta dengan data lengkap; sampel ditentukan berdasarkan keikutsertaan dalam ujian, bukan status penerimaan. Analisis meliputi statistik deskriptif, tabulasi asal sekolah, jenis kelamin, program studi pilihan pertama, analisis aspek, analisis butir menggunakan corrected point-biserial, dan reliabilitas KR-20.
Temuan – Rata-rata Literasi Dasar Keislaman sebesar 69,52, median 70, Q1 60, dan Q3 80. Sebanyak 31,33% peserta memperoleh nilai ≤60 dan 44,91% berada di bawah 70. Tajwid dan akidah menjadi aspek terlemah, sedangkan ihsan/akhlak terlalu mudah. Reliabilitas KR-20 sebesar 0,63. Perbedaan berdasarkan jenis kelamin tidak substantif, sedangkan variasi asal sekolah dan program studi menunjukkan kebutuhan pembinaan yang tidak seragam.
Implikasi/keterbatasan penelitian – Hasil mendukung pembinaan berjenjang berbasis diagnosis awal, terutama pada tajwid dan akidah. Generalisasi terbatas pada peserta yang terekam dalam arsip CBT dan tidak seluruhnya diterima di UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
Orisinalitas/nilai – Penelitian ini menunjukkan pemanfaatan data seleksi sebagai dasar diagnostik pembinaan, bukan hanya alat pemeringkatan.
References
Chen, Y., Li, X., Liu, J. and Ying, Z. (2021). Item Response Theory -- A Statistical Framework for Educational and Psychological Measurement. In London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). London School of Economics and Political Science. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2108.08604
El‐Hamamsy, L., Zapata-Cáceres, M., Martín, E., Mondada, F., Zufferey, J. D. and Barbara, B. (2022). The competent Computational Thinking test (cCTt): Development and validation of an unplugged Computational Thinking test for upper primary school. In arXiv (Cornell University). Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2203.05980
Henry, A. (2021). Religious Literacy in Social Media: A Need for Strategic Amplification. Religion & Education, 48(1), 89–101. pp. https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2021.1876507
Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429298899
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2023 tentang Penguatan Moderasi Beragama, (2023).
Schmucker, R. and Moore, S. (2026). The impact of item-writing flaws on difficulty and discrimination in item response theory. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 11, 100632–100632. pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100632
Slepkov, A. D., Bussel, M. L. V., Fitze, Kara. M. and Burr, W. S. (2021). A Baseline for Multiple-Choice Testing in the University Classroom. In SAGE Open (Vol. 11, Issue 2). SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211016838
Takona, J. P. (2023). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches / sixth edition. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 1011–1013. pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01798-2
Wang, Z., Lamb, A., Saveliev, E., Cameron, P., Zaykov, Y., Hernández-Lobato, J. M., Turner, R. E., Baraniuk, R. G., Barton, C., Jones, S. P., Woodhead, S. and Zhang, C. (2021). Results and Insights from Diagnostic Questions: The NeurIPS 2020 Education Challenge. In arXiv (Cornell University). Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2104.04034
Young, N. T., Mills, M., Matz, R. L., Bell, E. F. and Hayward, C. (2023). Complex multiple-choice questions are inequitable for low-income and domestic students (and difficult for everyone). In arXiv (Cornell University). Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2306.11068
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ari Cahya, Adhika Alvianto, Anggit Damaz Istoko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Al Huda: Journal of Islamic Education and Society agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
